Minutes from the 2009 AFS – Fisheries Administration Section Spring Meeting held at the Crystal Gateway Marriot in Arlington, Virginia are now online.
Oct 03
Minutes from the 2008 AFS – Fisheries Administration Section Annual Meeting held at the Ottawa Chateau Laurier – Renaissance Room, August 17, 2008 are now online.
Oct 03
Minutes from the 2008 AFS – Fisheries Administration Section Spring Meeting held at the Holiday Inn Chicago Mart Plaza, Chicago, Illinois are now online.
Oct 02
The annual Sport Fish Restoration outstanding project awards given by the Fisheries Administration Section of the American Fisheries Society are intended to both highlight the importance and effectiveness of the Sport Fish Restoration program and recognize excellence in fisheries management, research, and education. The Sport Fish Restoration Program, also known as the Dingell-Johnson or Wallop-Breaux program after its primary Congressional sponsors, is an excise tax collected on fishing tackle, boats, and motorboat fuel. Revenues are returned to the states to enhance fisheries and boating activities. The program was first created in 1950 and has provided nearly $3 billion toward better fishing and boating.
The Fisheries Administration Section recognizes the absolutely critical importance of this program for state fisheries agencies, but also knows that the program is subject to periodic reauthorization by Congress and ongoing scrutiny from the users who pay the excise tax. This annual awards program helps identify and showcase outstanding fisheries projects from across the country and hopefully generates continued support for the Sport Fish Restoration Program. Three “Outstanding Project of the Year” awards are given each year, one in each of the following categories: Sport Fishery Development and Management, Research and Surveys, and Aquatic Education. The 2008 award winning projects are described below:
2008 Sport Fishery Development and Management Outstanding Sport Fish Restoration Project of the Year
Iowa Department of Natural Resources— Restoration of Four Southwest Iowa Constructed Lakes – Leveraging Sport Fish Restoration Funds for Regional Resource Improvement
The Southwest Iowa Lakes Restoration Project (SILRP) addressed lake-basin and watershed problems and was critical to Iowa Department of Natural Resources’ efforts to build partnerships and improve water quality, fish habitat and lake access in four important Southwest Iowa lakes. Partnerships established during the lake restoration efforts were invaluable for moving forward to address problems at other related lakes and watersheds. Information learned from this study has widespread applicability for numerous lakes throughout Iowa and other surrounding states that suffer from similar problems.
The four lakes of the SILRP project are a significant resource in Iowa’s efforts to increase angling in the southwest region of the state. The Iowa Angler Survey found that greater than 60% of licensed anglers fishing trips are taken within 20-miles of home and the most commonly fished type of water bodies were constructed lakes. Improvements to these lakes will continue to be an asset to the local economy for many years to come. The work associated with fishing jetties and inlake habitat will be used extensively by both fish and anglers. Documented changes in water quality, fish populations, and lake use will be important in planning other lake improvement projects.
The project is expected to result in significant positive economic impact to Southwest Iowa. According to recent studies by Iowa State University’s Center for Agriculture and Rural Development, during the 2002-2005 period, the four Southwest Iowa project lakes averaged 199,625 visitors annually. They spent an average $14.42 million annually, which in turn supported jobs and labor income to the region. Assessments estimate that future economic benefits will return ten dollars for each dollar invested. The positive economics associated with this project is due to the observed increase in visitation post restoration.
The project will also result in improved long-term fishery habitat improvement and access for anglers. Success of this project has generated interest and public support for Iowa’s Lake Restoration Program, which will lay the foundation for future projects.
More information about the Southwest Iowa Lakes Restoration Project and Iowa’s Lake Restoration Program can be found at www.iowadnr.gov.
Project Contact: George Antoniou, (515) 281-8042, George.Antoniou@dnr.iowa.gov
2008 Research and Surveys Outstanding Sport Fish Restoration Project of the Year
Virginia Department of Game and Inland Fisheries—Restoration and Enhancement of the New River Walleye Fishery
The New River in Virginia is nationally renowned for its smallmouth bass fishery, but a limited walleye fishery had also existed for many years. Occasional catches of large walleye by anglers had resulted in several state records, and fisheries surveys periodically yielded walleye greater than 15 pounds. Fisheries biologists with the Virginia Department of Game and Inland Fisheries partnered with researchers from Virginia Tech to conduct research into the genetic structure of the walleye population in the upper New River (upstream of Claytor Lake) from 1997-99. A genetically unique walleye stock was identified that may be native to the New River and has remained segregated from stocked walleye by its spawning habits. In 2000, management of the upper New River population focused on conservation of the unique stock through genetically selecting spawners and supplemental stocking of their offspring.
The goal of the New River walleye program was to re-establish a population of New River stock walleye in the 74 miles of river above Claytor Lake in order to provide a viable fishery for recreational angling. No stocking of walleye other than the unique stock was to occur. Virginia Department of Game and Inland Fisheries biologists teamed with their Virginia Tech partners in developing a restoration plan designed on marker-assisted brood fish collection and selective spawning of the genetically unique walleye stock. Each spring from 2000-2008, known spawning locations were targeted for possible brood fish collection. Individual fish were marked with numbered tags, fin clipped and reproductive-sized walleye were held overnight in tanks while genetic analysis of each fish was carried out at Virginia Tech. Walleye with the diagnostic genetic markers were selected for use as brood fish for hatchery production. From 2000-2002 the trial and error process of brood stock selection resulted in 10,000 New River stock walleye being stocked. Greater success in brood fish collection, identification and hatchery operations resulted in approximately 566,000 New River strain walleye being stocked from 2003-2008.
Stocking success and recruitment to the sport fishery were measured by annual spring and fall sampling by fisheries biologists, system-wide genetic analysis, and angler surveys. Population monitoring indicated the need for stricter harvest regulations, and a 20 inch minimum size limit for walleye was implemented on January 1, 2003. Catch of river walleye in spring electrofishing sampling rose from 1 per hour in 2002 to 17 per hour in 2007. Screenings of genetic markers over the course of the study have shown increasing frequencies of alleles associated with the native stock. Angler surveys, often the true test of a fisheries restoration project, indicated a doubling of fishing effort towards walleye in the upper New River and a seven fold increase in the number caught and no negative measurable consequences to the very popular smallmouth bass fishery.
More information about the walleye restoration work on the New River can be found at www.dgif.virginia.gov.
Project Contact: Fred D. Leckie, Jr. (804) 367-1000, Fred.Leckie@dgif.virginia.gov
2008 Aquatic Education Outstanding Sport Fish Restoration Project of the Year
Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources—Wild Rose Hatchery Education Center
As part of the first phase of a three phase plan to renovate the Wild Rose State Fish Hatchery, the $1.5 million Education Center was completed in 2008 and incorporates four historic buildings from the hatchery and uses live aquariums, video and extensive exhibits to share the story of Wild Rose and fisheries management.
Wild Rose has a rich history dating back to the early 1900s. Local citizens and visitors alike used to stroll the hatchery grounds and even stop and have a picnic. The Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources has made sure that Wild Rose continues to be a local attraction for residents and visitors in the area and that it provides an educational experience for all visitors to the hatchery – from the general public, to university students and school groups. Visitors to Wild Rose can still enjoy a picnic lunch on the historic hatchery grounds, but now they can also immerse themselves in the 2,500-square-foot Education Center which is filled with interactive displays for all ages that tell the story of the hatchery and fish production, from past to present.
Perhaps the center favorites are the two large, free-standing aquariums that house fish species raised right at Wild Rose. And there’s more to come! In the making is an interactive area for children, an exhibit on Lake Michigan, and user-controlled videos that will guide visitors through the hatchery and fish production processes.
The Wild Rose State Fish Hatchery is a reliable workhorse that’s been delivering fishing fun and enhancing and restoring fish populations in Wisconsin for more than a century. Wild Rose grows more trout and salmon than any other and upon completion of the second phase of renovation – new cool water fish production facilities – Wild Rose will once again be producing musky, sturgeon, northern pike and walleye to test anglers statewide.
More information about the Wild Rose State Fish Hatchery can be found at http://dnr.wi.gov/fish/wildrose/
Project Contact: Mike Staggs (608) 267-0796 mike.staggs@wisconsin.gov or Steve Fajfer (920) 622-3527 steven.fajfer@wisconsin.gov
Contact: Robert Curry
AFS-FAS President-Elect
(919) 707-0221
robert.curry@ncwildlife.org
Sep 10
The annual Sport Fish Restoration outstanding project awards given by the Fisheries Administration Section of the American Fisheries Society are intended to both highlight the importance and effectiveness of the Sport Fish Restoration program and recognize excellence in fisheries management, research, and education. The Sport Fish Restoration Program, also known as the Dingell-Johnson or Wallop-Breaux program after its primary Congressional sponsors, is an excise tax collected on fishing tackle, boats, and motorboat fuel. Revenues are returned to the states to enhance fisheries and boating activities. The program was first created in 1950 and has provided nearly $3 billion toward better fishing and boating.
The Fisheries Administration Section recognizes the absolutely critical importance of this program for state fisheries agencies, but also knows that the program is subject to periodic reauthorization by Congress and ongoing scrutiny from the users who pay the excise tax. This annual awards program helps identify and showcase outstanding fisheries projects from across the country and hopefully generates continued support for the Sport Fish Restoration Program. Three “Outstanding Project of the Year” awards are given each year, one in each of the following categories: Sport Fishery Development and Management, Research and Surveys, and Aquatic Education. The 2008 award winning projects are described below:
2007 Sport Fishery Development and Management Outstanding Sport Fish Restoration Project of the Year
Oklahoma Department of Wildlife Conservation—Evening Hole and Lost Creek Restoration Project
Applied fluvial geomorphology techniques were used to improve fish habitat, channel shape, stream flow, sediment transport and water temperature in Evening Hole, a 1,600-foot trout stream below Broken Bow Reservoir. In addition, a new 1,200-foot trout stream, called Lost Creek, was constructed nearby, along a remnant floodplain. Vegetation, grade control, and bank stabilization structures were installed to ensure stream stability, while riffles, runs, pools, woody cover, native gravel, and cobblestones were added to provide trout habitat. The project was made possible by donations from trout anglers and SFR funds. Other partners included the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the Oklahoma Department of Tourism.
Project contact: Jeff Boxrucker, (405) 521-4606, jboxrucker@odwc.state.ok.us
2007 Research and Surveys Outstanding Sport Fish Restoration Project of the Year
Minnesota Department of Natural Resources—Lake Survey Mobile Software and Hardware Project
A robust mobile Fisheries Lake Survey system was developed and implemented to capture, store, analyze, and share current and historical physical, chemical, and biological information regarding habitat, water quality and fish population characteristics. This new system provides data entry while in the field and allows immediate reporting, saving thousands of hours of staff time (valued at >$200,000 annually), ensuring quality data, and easier sharing with the public.
Project Contact: Rick Lorenzen, (651) 259-5216, Rick.Lorenzen@dnr.state.mn.us
2007 Aquatic Education Outstanding Sport Fish Restoration Project of the Year
Texas Department of Parks and Wildlife—Texas Freshwater Fisheries Center
SFR Funds, along with a variety of both private and public partners, have allowed the Center to increase its public education offerings since the facility was constructed in 1996. Over the last six years, a fish hatchery tram was constructed and placed into service; a wetlands and a wetlands trail with interpretive wayside exhibits, pavilions, restrooms, and interactive interpretive stations were completed; and an outdoor amphitheater, a casting pond and pier; a conservation center, a classroom, a teaching lab, and a game warden museum were built.
Project contact: Allen Forshage, (903) 670-2224, Allen.Forshage@tpwd.state.tx.us
2007 Honorable Mention SFR Project of the Year
Arkansas Game and Fish Commission and Arkansas Chapter of Trout Unlimited—Renovation of Parker Bend Angler Access Facility
An angler access facility on a tailwater trout stream below Beaver Reservoir was renovated to protect the streambank from erosion, deepen the main channel, improve fish habitat, and enhance angler opportunities, including access for handicapped anglers. Two “J-Vanes,” each 200 feet long, were constructed using boulders that were capped with 160 feet of sidewalk. SFR funds, FEMA funds, a contribution from the Arkansas Chapter of Trout Unlimited, and a Lowe’s Store (that donated the boulders) made the project possible.
Project Contact: Larry Rider, (877) 967-7577 ext. 361, lrider@agfc.@state.ar.us
2007 Honorable Mention SFR Project of the Year
Minnesota Department of Natural Resources—Fishing: Get in the Habitat!
The MinnAqua Leader’s Guide for Angling and Aquatic Education is a 1,300-page curriculum for grades 3-5 that has chapters on aquatic habitats, Minnesota fish, water stewardship, fisheries management, fishing equipment and skills, and safety and the fishing trip. It includes 39 lessons and appendices that intend to lead students on a developmental continuum of learning from awareness, knowledge, attitudes, skills development, to empowerment and action.
Project Contact: Michelle Kelly, (651) 582-8417, Michelle.Kelly@dnr.state.mn.us
Contact: Don Gabelhouse, Jr.
AFS-FAS President
(402) 471-5515
Don.Gabelhouse@ngpc.ne.gov
Oct 16
AFS – Fisheries Administration Section Meeting
Sunday, September 2, 2007
San Francisco Marriot – Pacific A Room
Welcome/Call to Order (at 1:07 PM)
Introductions – Gary Saul
Secretary/ Treasurer Ken Kurzawski noted a quorum was present.
Announcements
Ken Kurzawski noted long-time FAS member Jack Wingate recently-retired from Minnesota DNR was awarded this year’s AFS Meritorious Service Award. Mary Fabrizio added that Bob Curry from North Carolina received the AFS Distinguished Service Award for his work on the Southern Division’s response to assisting AFS members impacted by Hurricanes Katrina and Rita.
Hutton Program Update – Danielle Hawkins
Program is designed to stimulate interest in high school students especially in underrepresented groups. So far, 271 students have gone through the program. This year was the 7th summer and 36 students were in the program. Of these students, 72% are going into fisheries or biological studies in college and the rest are contemplating that career path. The program is always looking for additional persons and agencies to support students and serve as mentors.
Review/ Approval of Minutes from April 28-29, 2007 AFS-FAS meeting in Corpus Christi, Texas
Ken Kurzawski handed out copies of the minutes and the minutes were also previously distributed to members by email. Bob Curry moved to approve the minutes as written and was seconded by Robin Knox. Minutes were approved.
Review of Treasurers Report – Ken Kurzawski
Copies of the report were made available at the meeting. Current balance is around $6,600. Some out-of-ordinary expenses for last year’s NFHAP workshop in Lake Placid are noted but the Section ultimately only contributed $167 for that workshop.
Highlights from AFS Governing Board Meeting – Gary Saul
Governing Board meetings started on Thursday. Society’s financial situation has improved to where there is now a surplus of funds. The Governing Board is looking at ways to spend that money. One is a new online Marine Journal that will begin this year. Another outlet would be publications that take scientific studies and craft information understandable to the general public to improve the public’s understanding and increase advocacy for fisheries resources.
Electronic services need some attention. Web services committee has been renamed to oversee all electronic info. programs. Funds will be contributed to achieve that.
Bob Curry talked about disaster relief effort as a result of hurricanes along the Gulf Coast a couple years ago. Support has been provided to Mississippi and Louisiana in the form of memberships and travel scholarships. AFS supported that effort by contributing $30K. A disaster relief center was developed and provided everything from library resources to trap nets. Got lots of support from numerous individuals. AFS Second Vice President Don Jackson will establish procedures as to how AFS can respond to members needs in the case of some future disaster. One goal is to improve response times. A small amount of money will be set aside to jumpstart that process. Members in MS and LA were extremely appreciative of everyone’s support.
Some of the officers of Sections, etc., have trouble attending Governing Board meetings either because their unit has limited funds or their employers are unable to support their travel. The Governing Board has supported contributing some funds for that. Mary Fabrizio noted she appointed Gary Saul to the committee that will work on formulating rules for distribution of those funds.
Gary invited incoming AFS President Mary Fabrizio to address the group. Mary noted lots of exciting activity in AFS partially due to the financial stability. One priority for her will be to focus on NFHAP. Habitat is crucial and support and/or directions from groups like the FAS will be needed. She has discussed this with Stan Moberly, the AFS rep. to the NFHAP Board. Andy Loftus noted AFS is administering $1 million dollars for the NFHAP.
- Chris Estes – AFS has been a driver for the science and workshops and Stan is our Society’s rep. Stan wants everyone to know they can contact him.
- John Nickum asked about source of money.
- Andy Loftus answered primary source has been the multistate grants, which are coming to an end.
- Gary asked Mary at GB meeting to help the states get more visibility at AFWA, which is crucial to many of these efforts.
- Chris Estes – AFS may want to formally get reps. on the partnership steering committees.
- Annual Meetings and their future direction was discussed. Should we join with other organizations or have meeting based on one topic or issue? Mary, with help from others, will look at that during the next year.
Old Business
Update on Urban Fishing Symposium
Tom Lang thanked FAS for support. A kids fishing event for trout was held this morning, which started the meeting and symposium. Over 200 kids fished. The Symposium has completely funded their proceedings with support from numerous organizations. The proceedings will include 34 oral presentations with a discussion sections that will be held on Wednesday afternoon and 17 posters. Over 100 individuals from 55 entities pre-registered for the Symposium.
FAS Bylaws Changes – Ken Kurzawski
Last year, we voted to change our bylaw to modify the name of our section from the Fisheries Administrators Section to the Fisheries Administration Section. We made this change to be more inclusive of all interested AFS members. At the 2006 AFS business meeting in Lake Placid, there was some discussion from the floor on the description of our Section in the AFS Constitution and Rules (Rule 4.I) and some wording changes were made to the description in an attempt to broaden our Section. After the meeting, we discussed further simplification of the description with Gwen White, AFS Constitutional Consultant and a FAS member. The parent society constitution would need to be amended to reflect those changes.
Rule 4.I would read: The FISHERIES ADMINISTRATION SECTION is an association of members who have a stake in the administration of fisheries agencies or programs; and who wish to encourage timely discussions and exchanges of information on issues that impact fisheries management programs and users.
This amendment will be voted on at the AFS business meeting on Tuesday. (Editor’s note: The amendment was approved at the meeting.)
Note – Ken Kurzawski recognized Chris Horton from BASS and thanked him for his organizations contribution to last year’s NFHAP workshop in Lake Placid.
2007 Federal Aid in Sport Fish Restoration Awards – Don Gabelhouse
We received 10 applications from 8 states. Mike Staggs (not in attendance) suggested putting all applicants on our website as all the programs that applied were outstanding. Applications were received from Oklahoma, Minnesota, Arkansas, Texas, Kentucky, Maine, North Carolina, and Indiana. Applications were reviewed and scored by Gary Martel, Mike Staggs, Mike Stone, Doug Stang, and Ken Kurzawski. At a later date, someone from the Section will come and deliver the awards. Don mentioned he got to go to Utah to present one of last year awards to Utah for their work on the Strawberry Reservoir renovations. It was a great opportunity to make another fisheries agency look good. Awards were presented in three categories plus two honorable mentions.
Sport Fishery Development and Management Outstanding SFR Project of the Year
-Oklahoma Department of Wildlife Conservation—Evening Hole and Lost Creek Restoration Project
Applied fluvial geomorphology techniques were used to improve fish habitat, channel shape, stream flow, sediment transport and water temperature in Evening Hole, a 1,600-foot trout stream below Broken Bow Reservoir. In addition, a new 1,200-foot trout stream, called Lost Creek, was constructed nearby, along a remnant floodplain. Vegetation, grade control, and bank stabilization structures were installed to ensure stream stability, while riffles, runs, pools, woody cover, native gravel, and cobblestones were added to provide trout habitat. The project was made possible by donations from trout anglers and SFR funds. Other partners included the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the Oklahoma Department of Tourism.
Project contact: Jeff Boxrucker, (405) 521-4606, jboxrucker@odwc.state.ok.us
Research and Surveys Outstanding SFR Project of the Year
-Minnesota Department of Natural Resources—Lake Survey Mobile Software and Hardware Project
A robust mobile Fisheries Lake Survey system was developed and implemented to capture, store, analyze, and share current and historical physical, chemical, and biological information regarding habitat, water quality and fish population characteristics.
This new system provides data entry while in the field and allows immediate reporting, saving thousands of hours of staff time (valued at >$200,000 annually), ensuring quality data, and easier sharing with the public.
Project Contact: Rick Lorenzen, (651) 259-5216, Rick.Lorenzen@dnr.state.mn.us
Aquatic Education Outstanding SFR Project of the Year
-Texas Department of Parks and Wildlife—Texas Freshwater Fisheries Center
SFR Funds, along with a variety of both private and public partners, have allowed the Center to increase its public education offerings since the facility was constructed in 1996. Over the last six years, a fish hatchery tram was constructed and placed into service; a wetlands and a wetlands trail with interpretive wayside exhibits, pavilions, restrooms, and interactive interpretive stations were completed; and an outdoor amphitheater, a casting pond and pier; a conservation center, a classroom, a teaching lab, and a game warden museum were built.
Project contact: Allen Forshage, (903) 670-2224, Allen.Forshage@tpwd.state.tx.us
Honorable Mention SFR Projects of the Year
Arkansas Game and Fish Commission and Arkansas Chapter of Trout Unlimited—Renovation of Parker Bend Angler Access Facility
An angler access facility on a tailwater trout stream below Beaver Reservoir was renovated to protect the streambank from erosion, deepen the main channel, improve fish habitat, and enhance angler opportunities, including access for handicapped anglers. Two “J-Vanes,” each 200 feet long, were constructed using boulders that were capped with 160 feet of sidewalk. SFR funds, FEMA funds, a contribution from the Arkansas Chapter of Trout Unlimited, and a Lowe’s Store (that donated the boulders) made the project possible.
Project Contact: Larry Rider, (877) 967-7577 ext. 361, lrider@agfc.@state.ar.us
Minnesota Department of Natural Resources—Fishing: Get in the Habitat!
The MinnAqua Leader’s Guide for Angling and Aquatic Education is a 1,300page curriculum for grades 3-5 that has chapters on aquatic habitats, Minnesota fish, water stewardship, fisheries management, fishing equipment and skills, and safety and the fishing trip. It includes 39 lessons and appendices that intend to lead students on a developmental continuum of learning from awareness, knowledge, attitudes, skills development, to empowerment and action.
Project Contact: Katie Kipka, (651) 259-5217, kathleen.kipka@dnr.state.mn.us
Exchange Program with United Kingdom Institute of Fisheries Management – Gary Saul
The program started a few years ago, and we alternate going to the UK with the Fish Management Section. Dale Burkett will represent the Section this fall. Dale is going to Limerick in October and the main topic of his presentation will be the NAAAR.
Gwen White thanked the FAS for our support of the Equal Opportunity Section travel awards. This year, travel for 11 students was supported. Gwen reminded the group that this is an annual program.
Gary expressed appreciation for the opportunity to serves as Section President.
New Business
Installation of New Officers
Don Gabelhouse took over as President. Bob Curry was elected as President-elect and Ken Kurzawski was re-elected as Secretary/Treasurer. Don presented Gary with a Past-President’s plaque and thanked him for his service to the Section.
North American Lake Management Society’s 2008 Meeting – Don Gabelhouse At the FAS spring meeting in Corpus Christi, Don Bonneau from Iowa asked Section members to consider participating in the 2008 NALMS meeting to be held in Chicago in March. Don B’s plea was to get involved with another group of people who are interested in water quality, the “EPA types.” Don’s pushing the idea that fish and water quality people have to come together especially to support increased funding. Maybe this can happen as part of the NFHAP initiative. Don has started to plan a program for the March NALMS meeting. Most likely will come to us for some funding. The goal is to try to get the EPA-types to understand us, why fishing is important, and why water quality is important to both groups. Maybe we can resurrect the Section 314 funding source. There is a draft agenda being put together that Don B. is working on. Habitat work has been going on reservoirs in the middle part of the country for a number of years. Nebraska has spent $27 million over the past 10 years on habitat projects and Iowa has a similar program. We’d like to see some success stories on reservoirs/lakes on the other part of the country. Get any info for presentations to Don B.
Chris Estes made a comment that Don B was on the core work group that developed the NFHAP and had input on the linkage to water quality importance. The EPA was part of the federal caucus. The NFH Board would support this.
Don G. said the NALMS group needs to know who we are.
NFHAP Reservoir Initiative – Don Gabelhouse Phil Durocher is heading up that effort with Gary Martel, Doug Nygren and Don Gabelhouse. States with reservoirs and lakes need to have a way to get involved with the NFHAP. BASS supports this and Chris Horton noted it will be a topic at the upcoming AFWA meeting. At the AFWA meeting, they hope to start to develop a plan. There is the possibility of a follow-up meeting at the Southern Division meeting.
Bob Curry said that there was a need to get information out on the SD meeting as early as possible. Chris Horton followed up about the first meeting coming together 3 weeks before the Reservoir Symposium. Phil Durocher sent an email out on the meeting at AFWA. If anyone wasn’t on that list, let Phil or Chris know.
2008 FAS Spring Meeting – Don Gabelhouse We had decided that we wanted to get more in involved with agency directors, so every other year we’d attend the North American Conference. This year (2008) the meeting is in Phoenix and we were slated to do that. We specifically wanted to have a symposium on the agenda to develop interest among directors. One idea was to gather up our experiences on the recruitment and retention of anglers and marketing. Oklahoma, Ohio, and Florida have worked with Water Works Wonders. Look at what’s worked and what hasn’t worked. Don contacted Richard McCabe of the Wildlife Management Institute about our group becoming more involved and getting on the meeting’s agenda.
Agenda is filled for 2008 and decisions on the agenda are made in April at the conclusion of the spring meeting. The most time we can get is 2 hours or five presentations. In 2009, the meeting will be in Washington, D.C. We need to put a proposal for the symposium to get on the 2009 agenda. We are still on working on getting our foot in the door at this meeting to compete with the wildlife topics. Don noted attending the North American made him greatly appreciative of the value received by attendees at the AFS Annual meeting.
Dale Burkett – Need issues that get their attention; VHS, cormorants, silver carp headed for the Great Lakes.
Gary Saul said we have to compete with wildlife focus. Fish people have to make choices as to what meeting we attend. Our goal is to make North American more fish friendly; need more involvement.
Don G. – Noted we have conflicts with AFWA relative to the AFS Annual meeting. Our meeting in Columbus went well as Gary Isabel arranged for an excellent off-site meeting space.
Bob Curry asked if we can meet on site in Phoenix. If we can have our meeting there and have some presentations that would interest others including directors.
Don G. suggested we could switch to Nebraska next spring and then focus on attending and preparing a proposal to hold a symposium at the 2009 North American. There are options and we like to have attendees experience some local fishing. In Nebraska some of the best fishing is in the western part, which is not close to the cities in the eastern part. Another option is to fish some of the unchannelized portions of the Missouri River. Can have meeting anytime of the year, if we desire.
Andy Loftus asked what was Richard McCabe’s take on fish info; was he receptive? Don said yes, but their agenda was set.
Dale Burkett – Support going to Nebraska and then do DC well.
Robin went to NA in Portland; price is substantial. Getting time for everyone on the agenda is an issue. Agree that maybe best to do Nebraska in 2008 then do DC.
Don G. said we’ll do Nebraska then DC. Need a committee for DC symposium proposal – Dale, Robin.
John Nickum said a small group should go to Phoenix; there are some lower costs options.
Don G. said some section members will attend meeting; probably wouldn’t have quorum of members.
Don G. will plan on May or June in Nebraska and arrange some sort of fishing activity.
Gary Whelan thanked FAS for support of NFHAP; workshop had about 70 attendees.
Meeting Adjourned at 2:12 PM
Nov 21
Sunday, September 11, 2005
Anchorage Hilton – Alaska Room
Welcome and Introductions
Doug Stang called the meeting to order at 1:02 PM. A quorum (17 members) was present.
News from AFS
Jan Lubeck gave the annual report on the Hutton program. Danielle Hawkins is the new program assistant. Last year, the program had 300 applicants; 63 were funded. The program is starting to reach diversity goals. This was the first time a survey was done on participants. Danielle will produce a CD with results by mid-October. The consistent funding from federal agencies has been crucial. Jan and AFS encourage all agencies to participate in the Hutton program with financial support and as mentors for the Hutton participants.
Review / Approval of Minutes from May 21-22, 2005 AFS-FAS meeting in Buffalo, NY
Motion to approve the minutes was made (Dale Burkett) and seconded (Chris Goddard). Motion was approved without objection.
Review of Treasurers Report
The treasurer’s report prepared by Ron Southwick was reviewed (see attachment). Many of the expenses for the Spring ’05 meeting in Buffalo were covered by NY. Balance as of 8/31/05 was $5,410.71.
Highlights from AFS Governing Board
Doug gave the report –
- Financial health of Society is good. Operating budget is approximately $2.8 million. Reserve is at $2.2 million; approaching the goal of having a reserve equal to the 5-year running average of annual operating budgets.
- Dues remain flat. A “Young Professional” membership at half price will be offered. Student membership will be $19 and include Infobase.
- Most journals back to 1872 have been scanned into Infobase. Missing some old PFC’s.
Governing Board Retreat
- Both Doug and Gary Saul attended.
- Membership and career development surveys were conducted. Results will be in an upcoming Fisheries article. Around 86% of members are satisfied with AFS and what AFS offers.
- New initiatives are professional development, information transfer, and setting future priorities.
- The potential for a separate coastal/marine journal was discussed.
- Chris Kohler will put a committee together on future directions for the AFS.
- A “new” Mexico Chapter was created and assigned to the Western Division.
AFS – FAS Member Survey
In response to the desire to increase FAS membership above 200 that would give the FAS a vote on the Governing Board and to broaden geographical representation in the FAS, Mike Staggs did a survey of all current, past and potential members to solicit their views on the FAS and to generate ideas to increase participation in the Section. Mike presented the results (see attachment).
A discussion followed on what’s next and how best to use the survey information. Mike suggested that the survey information be combined with individual contacts and that used to develop some of the key action points. Development of an increased web site presence was mentioned. Some other suggestions were soliciting new members from younger and/or lower level administrators, continuing education at meetings, and a “better” meeting agenda.
Dale Burkett noted involvement was highest during projects such as Snowbird I and II or the cormorant issue in the South.
Paul Pajak suggested gleaning a small number (5?) of actions items from the survey and work on those. Also, be proactive in informing others about the section.
Doug noted most Sections have lost members recently.
Someone noted that posting newsletters on web sites and eliminated the need for people to pay dues to a Section to get the newsletter.
Andy Loftus asked about information on dues renewal and web site. (Note: Information on the FAS is present on both.)
Dave Terre suggested recruiting new members based on issues or get current “Chiefs” to recruit “future” chiefs.
Dale Burkett suggested FAS facilitate the use of mentors and develop a suggested list of training for administrators.
Mike noted travel funding and restrictions have always been an issue.
Paul Pajak suggested interjecting FAS members into training programs at other agencies.
Stuart Shipman suggesting developing a list of persons who should join and try to reach these people.
Don Gabelhouse suggested a name change. There is the perception that the FAS is the “Fish Chief’s Club” and that limits its interest among other administrators. A new name could broaden appeal. Fisheries “Leadership” section was suggested.
Steve Eder noted that a perspective from the other states may help us reach younger and new members.
At the spring meeting in Buffalo, some members volunteered to contact other states to encourage membership and participation. Some of these contacts still need to be made. Mike will integrate any of this information into his results.
North American Agenda for Aquatic Resources
A motion concerning FAS involvement in development and implementation of NAAAR was left pending at the Spring meeting due to lack of a quorum. Dale Burkett handed out the motion. Mike Staggs asked about the relationship of the NAAAR and the Fish Habitat Initiative. If we (FAS) don’t take the lead on the NAAAR, what will happen? Dale thinks it would go away. This may be a project that will create more interest in the FAS. Tim Hess noted the Highway bill will spike SFR funds in ‘07 which could help fund or move forward the NAAAR.
Motion to approve the resolution was made (Mike) and, seconded (Don Gabelhouse).
There was additional discussion on the motion focusing on the development of the resolution and numbered items. Paul Pajak noted there needs to be flexibility in the process and sustainability is paramount. Dale noted the document was edited based on previous discussions, and his vision was to use subcommittees created under the NAAAR to flesh out the agenda for the IAFWA. Mike Staggs asked about using this as a framework to address working relationship with the IAFWA and to integrate fish chiefs and administrators rather the Executive Director-level positions. For clarification, Dale noted the motion and vote was just on the first paragraph of the document. Tim Hess suggested the NAAAR may benefit from a more regional approach. Stuart Shipman said the North Central Division was going to address this issue. Who would appoint chair for the subcommittees or who would volunteer for the opportunity? Gary Saul? Steve Eder noted the Fish Habitat Initiative has a regional focus, but was not sure how they were set or will be set. A suggestion was made to follow AFS Divisions, which would be desirable.
Motion was approved without objection. (see attachment)
2005 Federal Aid in Sport Fish Restoration Awards
Gary Saul announced the following award recipients:
- Sport Fish Development and Management
Virginia Department of Game and Inland Fisheries: Restoration and Enhancement of the Laurel Lake Bed Fishery - Research and Surveys
Lake Michigan Technical Committee, Salmonid Working Group: Multi-Agency Collaboration to Evaluate Chinook Salmon Management - Aquatic Education
Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission: Kids’ Fishing Clinics - Honorable Mention – Research and Surveys
Lake Michigan Technical Committee, Yellow Perch Task Group: Multi-agency Research Initiative to Identify Likely Causes for Yellow Perch Recruitment Failure in Lake Michigan
FAS / FMS Exchange Program (with United Kingdom Institute of Fisheries Management)
Jim Gregory of the United Kingdom Institute of Fisheries Management (www.ifm.org.uk) was in attendance. He thanked the AFS for this opportunity. He noted his society has around 1,000 members and around 10-20% attend the meeting. Gary Saul will attend their meeting and give a presentation.
AFS Salary Survey
Doug Stang reported that 32 states have responded with two more promised. He needs to get more participation to get results accepted for publication in Fisheries.
Updating the criteria for Federal Aid in Sport Fish Restoration Awards program
No action due to lack of time.
President’s Closing Remarks
Doug thanked everyone for the opportunity and for their participation. He invited everyone to Lake Placid for the 2007 Annual Meeting.
Installation of New Officers
Gary Saul was installed as President. Don Gabelhouse is the new president-elect. Ken Kurzawski became the new secretary/treasurer.
New Business
Gary presented Doug with a Past-President’s plaque and thanked him for his outstanding leadership over the last two years. He also presented him with the opportunity to go on free guided fishing trip on world-famous Lake Fork Reservoir in Texas. A plaque of appreciation will also be presented to Ron Southwick, the previous Secretary/Treasurer.
Urban Fishing Symposium
Tom Lang of the University of Arkansas-Pine Bluff made a presentation and request for funding for a symposium on urban fishing being developed for the 2007 AFS Annual in San Francisco.
Motion to provide $500 funding was made by Doug Stang and seconded by Dirk Miller. Motion was approved without objection.
2006 FAS Spring Meeting
The Spring Meeting will be held March 22-25, 2006 in conjunction with the North American Wildlife and Natural Resources Conference in Columbus, Ohio. Details will follow.
AFS News Continued
Executive Director Gus Rassam quickly noted the Society is in excellent shape. President Barb Knuth thanked the Section for its support and for the resolution on the NAAAR. She will pass that information on to incoming president, Chris Kohler.
Meeting was adjourned at 3:05 PM.
Sep 16
2005 Sport Fishery Development and Management Outstanding SFR Project of the Year
Virginia Department of Game and Inland Fisheries - Laurel Bed Lake Restoration
Low pH and unbalanced fish populations severely limited fishing opportunities at Laurel Bed Lake, a 133-hectare impoundment in Russell County, Virginia. The reservoir was constructed in 1967 and a brook trout fishery provided regionally unique fishing opportunities during the 1970’s. Low pH soon limited productivity and the unauthorized stocking of rock bass provided unwanted competition for the brook trout. Rock bass were able to reproduce in the low pH (5.0) water and rapidly overpopulated the lake and became stunted. Competition from the rock bass limited growth of stocked trout fingerlings to the point that the put-grow-and-take management strategy was abandoned. In 1996 the lake was drained for structural repairs and biologists seized the opportunity to reclaim the lake’s fishery. The objectives were: 1) restore the lake’s habitat by increasing pH and acid neutralizing capacity (ANC) to levels that would support a variety of fishes, and 2) establish a fishery that would provide angling opportunities parallel to the physical and aesthetic qualities of the impoundment.
In collaboration with James Madison University, the Virginia DGIF developed a direct liming method for mitigating the low pH water. The method produced rapid and sustained results. The pH in the impoundment remained at or above 6.5 while the inflow remained near 5.0. ANC, which was negative prior to the liming increased to 60 µeq/L. The dosage was increased in 1998 and 1999 and biologist chose to not lime in 2000 to see if the sustained improvements in pH and ANC could persist beyond a year. The pH and ANC remained at suitable levels for two complete seasons and the liming strategy has evolved to applications every other year.
Fingerling brook trout were stocked in 1997 and survival and utilization has been good. Although considerable effort was exerted to eradicate rock bass, they are still present in the reservoir. Smallmouth bass were stocked in 1998 as a means to control rock bass and a new fishery for smallmouth subsequently developed. Angler surveys indicate that this multi-species fishery has resulted in an outstanding catch rate of 2 fish per hour for all species combined as well as a positive Benefit/Cost ratio for the project. An estimated $35,575 angler dollars were expended during a 2001 April-June survey period relative to the <$5,000 cost for liming every other year.
The Sport Fish Restoration program provided the means for restoration of a unique high elevation reservoir fishery through intensive and periodic water treatment (liming), water quality analyses to monitor the acid neutralizing capacity of the lake and stockings to produce quality fisheries for smallmouth bass, rock bass and brook trout. The project benefits extend beyond the Laurel Bed Lake restoration by integrating acidification remediation and multi-species management.
Project Contact: Fred D. Leckie, Jr. 804.367.1000, Fred.Leckie@dgif.virginia.gov
2005 Research and Surveys Outstanding SFR Project of the Year
Lake Michigan Technical Committee, Salmonid Working Group - A multi-agency collaboration to evaluate Chinook salmon management in Lake Michigan
Chinook salmon were introduced to Lake Michigan in 1967 to help control exotic forage fishes such as alewife and rainbow smelt. Chinook salmon now are the dominant predator in the Lake Michigan system, support a world-renowned sport-fishery, and significantly suppress alewife populations. Stocking levels were once highly correlated with harvest; however, the trends in harvest in Lake Michigan are no longer related to stocking alone. Stress mediated diseases such as bacterial kidney disease (BKD) can have strong regulatory influences on Chinook salmon populations, and in 1987-88, Chinook salmon experienced a noticeable disease epizootic and significant decline in abundance. Chinook salmon stocking levels were reduced in 1999 in an attempt to minimize the risk of another population crash. The Lake Michigan fisheries management agencies identified evaluation of Chinook salmon stocking strategies as one of the most significant management needs in the basin.
The Lake Michigan Technical Committee (LMTC) developed a collaborative approach for consistent, long-term, lake-wide evaluation of changes in stocking levels and evaluation of progress toward meeting fish community objectives for Lake Michigan’s salmonid community through the establishment of a Salmonid Working Group (SWG). The SWG was charged with developing a science-based approach to evaluate indices of the Chinook salmon population and to make recommendations for salmonid management. A set of criteria were used to measure the health of the Chinook salmon population and evaluate potential threats to the Lake Michigan predator-prey balance. The biological criteria encompass all currently available data from ongoing assessments including: estimates of abundance from harvest and fishery-independent surveys, contribution from stocking and natural reproduction, changes in growth and ration, trends in forage fish abundance, and indices of fish health. For each biological category, several indices were analyzed (for example, abundance is measured through weir returns, sport fish harvest, and gill net CPE).
The data to evaluate the above indices and population measures are provided primarily by management agency salmonid assessments (creel surveys, weir collections, fishery-independent netting assessments) funded almost entirely through Federal Aid in Sport Fish Restoration projects. In addition, university researchers, often funded in whole or part through SFR grants, contribute significantly to the effort. Members of the SWG meet regularly to consolidate and analyze assessment data. These meetings are also funded, at least in part, through Federal Aid in Sport Fish Restoration funds.
The early indicators of population status that were developed suggest that the population is beginning to undergo stress as abundance has increased, size-at-age has decreased, forage levels are likely to decline, and signs of disease are becoming evident. Early collection, interpretation, and action on these data are improving management of Lake Michigan salmonid populations.
The SWG facilitates use of the compiled data in predictive models (bioenergetics, food-web, catch-at-age, decision analysis) that are critical in evaluating possible management scenarios for all salmonines in Lake Michigan.
The surveys and analysis provided by the SWG and funded through SFR monies are helping the Lake Michigan Committee (and other Great Lakes fisheries managers) to define a long-term strategy for manipulation of Chinook salmon populations, and define the relative importance of two potentially conflicting goals (suppressing alewife populations to allow native sport fish rehabilitation, and minimizing the risk to the sport fishery associated with instability in Chinook salmon survival).
The work of the SWG exemplifies successful SFR project work through the development of long-term collaborative assessments (ongoing since 1999) involving multiple states (Illinois, Indiana, Michigan and Wisconsin), as well as multiple programs (research, management, hatchery sections) within each state. In addition, university researchers, often funded in whole or part through SFR grants, contribute significantly to the effort. USFWS personnel from the Green Bay Fisheries Research Office were also key players, as were other Federal and Tribal agencies, and constituent groups. The SWG is a standing working group of the LMTC and collaborative survey and analysis efforts will continue for the foreseeable future.
This collaborative research effort has improved management of salmonid fisheries in a resource of international importance. The Great Lakes are the largest freshwater system in the world, and resources are shared among multiple states and two countries. Salmonids (and in particular Chinook salmon) provide the premier sport fishery in all of the Great Lakes. Annual effort devoted to these fisheries in Lake Michigan can be greater than 8 million angler hours, and greater than 12 million angler days Great Lakes-wide.
Project Contact: David F. Clapp, 231.547.2914 (ext. 237), clappd@michigan.gov
2005 Aquatic Education Outstanding SFR Project of the Year
Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission – Kids’ Fishing Clinics
One goal of the Florida Fish and Wildlife Commission (FWC), Division of Marine Fisheries Management is to increase public participation in the management and preservation of Florida’s marine resources by heightening awareness of the importance of personal responsibility to the successful management of these resources. The FWC’s marine Kids’ Fishing Clinic (KFC) program started in 1996 in an effort to target Florida’s future marine resource users and encourage responsible behavior and decision-making among them. These free clinics introduce new anglers and non-angling groups to recreational fishing and the marine environment. Since the beginning of the program, over 25,000 children, 15,000 parents, and 4,000 volunteers have participated in 80 clinics statewide.
The Kids’ Fishing Clinic Protocol is online at http://myfwc.com/marine/fishingclinics/index.html. These clinics are unique because they provide more than just equipment and a place to fish. The clinics are a vehicle used to demonstrate to children that fish depend on habitat, how as anglers they are responsible for protecting that habitat, and why fishing regulations are important to follow. These principles are taught using five separate education stations that the participants must complete before they can fish. The five stations are called the good angler, the touch tank (where fish live), fishing tackle, knot tying, and casting. Upon completion of a clinic, participants are able to demonstrate basic angling techniques, such as knot tying and casting, and hopefully, catch a fish. But more importantly, they will be able to identify different types of marine habitat, discuss their importance to sport fish, and explain various actions they can perform while on the water in an effort to be good stewards toward Florida’s marine resources.
Though presented by FWC and SFR, the clinics are not possible without the support of each community. Each clinic has a community sponsor, either an individual or an organization, who is primarily responsible for helping FWC staff organize the KFC in their community. A group of volunteers is also enlisted for each clinic to help set-up and break down the clinic, teach the skills, and aid the participants while fishing. These volunteers come from fishing clubs, civic clubs (e.g., Kiwanis, Jaycees), local businesses, the marine industry, local communities, and other government agencies (e.g., USFWS, NMFS, NASA, Florida DEP).
Additionally, with the help of the KFC sponsors and volunteers, Florida communities purchased over 30,000 rod and reel combos; therefore, not only are participants exposed to the idea of ethical angling, but they can continue the fishing experience after they return home. These free clinics provide an opportunity for anyone, new users and non-users, to experience Florida’s marine resources. These clinics have also been successful at creating an opportunity for FWC and agency stakeholders to work together toward a common goal of increasing education and awareness of resource management. Finally, the clinics are a true demonstration of how communities can benefit from the Sport Fish Restoration “user pays – user benefits” program.
Continual evaluations of KFC’s by participants and volunteers have led to many improvements and help the program evolve to meet the needs of the FWC and its constituency.
Project Contact: Dr. Virginia Vail, 850.922.4340, Virginia.Vail@MyFWC.com
2005 Honorable Mention SFR Project
Lake Michigan Committee, Yellow Perch Task Group – a multi-agency research initiative to identify likely causes for yellow perch recruitment failure in Lake Michigan
Beginning around 1990, yellow perch population density declined in Lake Michigan due in part to an almost complete lack of recruitment. In response to this dramatic decline, the Lake Michigan Yellow Perch Task Group (YPTG) was formed (under the auspices of the Great Lakes Fishery Commission’s Lake Michigan Committee) to develop a multi-agency research initiative to identify the likely cause(s) for yellow perch recruitment failure. Specifically, the group addressed five factors (predation, zooplankton availability, temperature, mass water movement, and spawning stock characteristics) potentially influencing recruitment of yellow perch.
The Core YPTG membership consists of at least one representative from each management agency on Lake Michigan, plus several researchers with known interest and experience in yellow perch research questions. In addition to this core group, researchers and managers from outside the basin are also invited to participate.
Research is ongoing, but the YPTG has made considerable progress since 1997 toward its objective of identifying the causes of poor yellow perch recruitment in Lake Michigan. We identified and implemented a collaborative approach among a large number of researchers and managers that made significant progress in a short time. Findings to date from the Lake Michigan YPTG research initiative have several significant implications for management of yellow perch populations in Lake Michigan and for fish populations in general.
Coordinated research and assessment activities led to lake-wide improvements in yellow perch stock assessments. Lake-wide coordination and standardization of methods improved compatibility and usefulness of data. Knowledge gained through the development of statistical catch-at-age models is providing managers more explicit and detailed information about yellow perch stocks, as they seek to effectively balance the recreational and commercial demands on these fish populations.
Work by YPTG researchers has improved our predictive capabilities with respect to yellow perch recruitment. We have a better understanding of how recruitment is related to zooplankton abundance and temperature; knowledge concerning these relationships will improve Lake Michigan yellow perch management.
The multi-agency effort has made substantial progress in addressing yellow perch recruitment, and serves as a model for agencies to work collaboratively to address important management questions with a sound research strategy. In our judgment, keys to the long-term success of this group include a dynamic and collaborative interaction among researchers and managers; the recognition that a problem exists that no single agency or group can effectively address; willingness to share data and observations among group members, especially outside of formal meetings; and embracing expertise from outside the core group of participants to address key research needs. This model can result in substantive progress in addressing difficult management decisions regarding exploited fish stocks, regardless of the system.
Project Contact: David F. Clapp, 231.547.2914 (ext. 237), clappd@michigan.gov
