Jeffrey Hill and Charles Cichra, Department of Fisheries
and Aquatic Sciences, University of Florida, 7922 NW 71st Street, Gainesville, Florida
32653; Voice 352-392-9617; E-Mail jcichla@aol.com
Leo G. Nico, Florida Caribbean Science Center, Biological Resources
Division, United States Geological Survey,7920 NW 71st Street, Gainesville, Florida 32653
Carter Gilbert, Florida Museum of Natural History, University of
Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32611
Keywords: peacock cichlid, largemouth bass, gape limitation,
exotic
This study determined that gape width of the peacock cichlid, Cichla
ocellaris (Perciformes: Cichlidae), as indicated by external mouth width, is a good
estimator of the maximum size of forage ingested. Gape limitation is important in
determining theoretical prey availability to the predator population and is one possible
axis of interspecific interaction between co-occurring predators. The peacock cichlid was
introduced into South Florida canals by the Florida Game and Fresh Water Fish Commission.
The primary biological justification was an unbalanced forage to predator biomass ratio
due to an overabundance of exotic species, especially spotted tilapia (Tilapia mariae).
Regression models of gape width versus length were developed for peacock cichlid and
largemouth bass (Micropterus salmoides). Peacock cichlid gape limitation estimates
were tested by analysis of stomach contents and a laboratory forage experiment. No forage
fish body depth exceeded the gape width of the predator in the stomach contents analysis.
Three individuals ate bluegill (Lepomis macrochirus) slightly exceeding (less than
5 %) estimated gape size in the experiment. Gape width versus total length regression
slopes for peacock cichlid and largemouth bass were compared and found statistically
different. Peacock cichlid gape was larger below 86 mm TL, while above this length,
largemouth bass gape was larger.