se2.gif (1021 bytes)

Southern Division
of the
American Fisheries Society

Alabama - Arkansas - Florida - Georgia - Kentucky - Louisiana - Maryland - Mississippi - North Carolina - Oklahoma - South Carolina - Tennessee - Texas - Virginia - Washington, D.C. - West Indian Islands - West Virginia

Quick Links:

 

 
Home

Bylaws

Committees

Events

History

Jobs

Links

Meeting
Abstracts

Meeting
Minutes

Newsletters

Resolutions

Scholarships

SEAFWA

Software

Spring
Meeting

Students

Work
Plan

AFS List
Server

 

From the 1999 Southern Division of the American Fisheries Society Midyear Meeting held in Chattanooga, Tennessee.

Evaluation of a Pilot Largemouth Bass Micropterus salmoides Stocking Program using Radio Telemetry

Jason G. Freund and Kyle J. Hartman Wildlife and Fisheries Program Division of Forestry West Virginia University 322 Percival Hall P.O. Box 6125 Morgantown West Virginia 26501-6125 Voice 304- 293-2941 x2417 FAX 304-293-2441 E-Mail jfreund@wvu.edu

Keywords: largemouth bass, radio telemetry, Ohio River, stocking, embayments


Due to the perceived long-term reduction in the quality of the largemouth bass fishery in the Ohio River, many angling organizations are pressing the West Virginia Department of Natural Resources to stock largemouth bass in the Ohio River. Radio telemetry was used to analyze the success of a pilot largemouth bass (Micropterus salmoides) stocking in embayments of the Ohio River. Six adult largemouth bass obtained from a hatchery were implanted with 8-gram radio transmitters. Twenty adult largemouth bass captured through electrofishing and bass tournaments in the Belleville Pool of the Ohio River were fitted with radio transmitters of two percent or less of their body weight. The Belleville Pool is a 70.5-km navigation pool formed by the Belleville Lock and is bordered by the states of Ohio and West Virginia. Due to the size of the Ohio River, stocking sufficient numbers of bass to produce what anglers would perceive, as a "quality" fishery is not feasible. Therefore fish were stocked into smaller embayments of the Ohio River and mortality, habitat preference, and seasonal movement were compared between the wild and stocked fish. In this paper, we discuss and compare these parameters between wild and stocked fish in light of the criteria that for a stocking program to be successful mortality of stocked bass should not be significantly greater than wild bass mortality and stocked bass must contribute to the spawn.


Back to Abstract
Index
Back to Stocking and
Regulations Index
 

Copyright © 2004 Southern Division of the American Fisheries Society
For problems or questions regarding this web contact fred.janssen@tpwd.state.tx.us
Last updated: November 22, 2004