Phillip W. Bettoli and Steve Owens, Tennessee
Cooperative Fishery Research Unit, Tennessee Technological University, Box 5114,
Cookeville, Tennessee 38505; Voice 931-372-3094; FAX 931-372-6257; E-Mail pbettoli@tntech.edu, sowens@tntech.edu
Keywords: trout, rivers, habitat, GIS, standing crops
Gross habitat features were mapped in the Clinch River, South Fork of
the Holston River, Watauga River, and Caney Fork River using GPS receivers and GIS
software. These habitat surveys complimented surveys of the fate of trout stocked into
each river. Each of these regulated rivers is managed as a put-and-take, or
put-grow-and-take fishery for rainbow trout Oncorhynchus mykiss and brown trout Salmo
trutta. The amount of trout habitat in these rivers varied widely, as did the biomass
of trout each system supported. Standing stocks of overwintering trout were highest in the
South Fork of the Holston River (170 - 232 kg/ha) and lowest in the Caney Fork River
(41-74 kg/ha). Not surprisingly, the South Fork of the Holston River had the highest ratio
of riffles and runs to pools; whereas, the Caney Fork River had a very low ratio of
riffles and runs to pools (1.2 / 1 / 1.85, respectively). Although tentative relations
between habitat and carrying capacities in these four tailwaters have been developed,
these relations are confounded by the influence of other factors such as minimum flows,
frequency of high discharge events, and water quality.