From the 1999 Southern Division of the American Fisheries Society Midyear Meeting held in Chattanooga, Tennessee.

Comparability and Accuracy of Scales and Otoliths for Ageing Wild Brown Trout in Tennessee

James W. Habera and Bart Carter, Tennessee Wildlife Resources Agency, 6032 W. Andrew Johnson Highway, Talbott, Tennessee 37877; Voice 423-587-7037; FAX 423-587-7057

Keywords: brown trout, ageing, otoliths, scales, accuracy


Scales and otoliths were collected from 227 wild brown trout (94-647 mmTL) from 11 Tennessee streams to assess the comparability and accuracy of the two structures for aging these fish. Accuracy was determined by examining scales and otoliths from known-age fish (up to age 5) from five streams. Maximum ages for scales and otoliths were 8 and 12 years, respectively. Overall, there was 74% agreement between corresponding scale and otolith ages (81%, ages 0-5; 21%, older fish). Scale age underestimated otolith age in 68% of cases where the structures did not agree (maximum, 5 years; mean, 1.6 years) and in 98% of disagreements involving age-3 and older fish. Consequently, the regression slope of scale age versus otolith age (0.72) was significantly different (P < 0.05) from the hypothetical slope of 1.00. All scale and otolith ages determined for known-age fish were accurate. Additionally, mean absolute ageing error for scales was <1 year through age 5, but usually exceeded a year afterward. Therefore, we conclude that scales are generally reliable for ageing wild brown trout up to age 5. Because growth of individual fish was highly variable (457-508 mm fish were 4-12 years old), length was an unreliable predictor of age for larger specimens.


Back to Abstract
Index
Back to Trout
Biology Index