Spring 2002 Projects Summary

 
  • Duke Power Company
    Contact: Dave Coughlan (704) 875-5236, djcoughl@duke-energy.com

    Hydroacoustics - We continue to use hydroacoustics and purse seining to evaluate reservoir forage fish populations. Forage fish densities are derived by echo integration.  Purse seine data provide species composition and length frequency distributions for correlation with target strength values.

    We are working cooperatively with North Carolina State University (NCSU) and NC Wildlife Resources Commission (NCWRC) on a bioenergetic comparison of two reservoir striped bass populations. One population resides in a eutrophic reservoir with abundant prey and frequent summer die-offs of stripers while the other is in an oligotrophic cooling reservoir with less abundant forage and infrequent summer die-offs. Calorimetric analyses of striped bass and forage fish are being conducted in addition to population estimates of forage fish. Jessica Thompson, a NCSU PhD student, is working on this project.

    An additional hydroacoustic question deals with the stability of forage fish populations (blueback herring and threadfin shad) over time in an oligotrophic reservoir experiencing a prolonged drawdown. Jocassee reservoir in upstate SC has been 20 ft below full pool for over one year and concerns exist that the forage populations may be more susceptible to entrainment during pumping operations at a pump-storage hydroelectric facility. Twice annual hydroacoustic surveys (March and November) for many years have demonstrated high population estimates in November and very low numbers the subsequent spring. Despite the particularly cold winter of 2000-2001 and very low water levels (23 ft. below full pool) the population rebounded to characteristic late-year population levels and indicated a dynamic population that is stable through time. Contact DJC or Hugh Barwick (704) 875-5459 for more details.

    Fish-Friendly Piers - Piers represent sources of structure and cover for reservoir fish populations, the importance of which appears to be increasing as some reservoirs experience rapid residential shoreline development. We have formed a partnership with NCWRC, NC Wildlife Habitat Foundation, Bass Pro Shops, Pure Fishing, NC BASS Federation, NC State University, USGS, and B.A.S.S. Inc. to evaluate the feasibility of enhancing shallow-water fish habitat by creating fish-friendly piers. These are piers with added structure (e.g., Berkley Fish Habs with and without brush) beneath the pier to provide additional cover for fish. Fish were sampled from all piers and transects in April, July, and October 2001. Generally, throughout all seasons, catch rates were higher at brushed 'hab' piers and 'habbed' piers sites than at reference pier sites. Similarly, fish abundance was generally higher on transects containing woody debris, brushed hab piers, or habbed piers than transects containing reference piers during spring and summer. However, few differences were observed during fall. On these reservoirs, fish abundance associated with developed shorelines appears to be related to the structural complexity of the habitat, even though the composition of the structure differs. Bob Barwick, a NCSU MS student, has evaluated fish use of these piers and is currently writing his thesis. Contact Hugh Barwick for more details (704) 875-5459.

    Blue Catfish Tracking - Duke Power and NCWRC are working cooperatively with Virginia Tech to study the movements of blue catfish in a large multi-use reservoir (Lake Norman, NC). Joe Grist, an MS student at VA Tech, has released radio-tagged blue cats and has been tracking them every two weeks for almost a year to get an idea of diurnal and seasonal movements. An understanding of blue catfish movement may give us a better idea of the feasibility of a blue catfish population estimate at some time in the future. The study is scheduled to conclude in the next few months.

To the top up_arrow.gif (883 bytes)

  • Kentucky Department of Fish and Wildlife Resources
    Jeff Crosby, #1 Game Farm Road, Frankfort, KY 40601
    jeff.crosby@mail.state.ky.us

     
    • Advanced Fingerling Largemouth Bass Stocking in Three Infertile Eastern Kentucky Reservoirs
      Jeff Ross, Fisheries Research Biologist, jeff.ross@mail.state.ky.us, 1-800-852-0942 ext. 361
       
      Eastern Kentucky reservoirs are generally believed to have poor largemouth bass fisheries than reservoirs located in central and western Kentucky. The current study is being conducted to determine if spring stocking (March) of wild-reared largemouth bass fingerlings (mean length _ 5.0 in.) can improve year-class strength of age-i largemouth bass in these lakes and result in an improved largemouth bass fishery. The three study reservoirs include Grayson, Carr Creek, and Dewey lakes. In this study, three stocking rates (about 5, 10, and 15 fish/acre) are being evaluated. Each rate will be stocked in each reservoir during two randomly chosen years. In addition to the stocking evaluation, recruitment models are being developed to determine major factors that influence recruitment in each reservoir.
       
      Each reservoir was stocked at rate of 10 fish/acre in 1999, 5 fish/acre in 2000, and 15 fish/acre in 2001. At Grayson Lake, 2001 spring electrofishing samples found 64.5% of all largemouth bass collected to be stocked fish. When broken down by size-group, the stocked largemouth bass made up 75.0% of the <8.0 inch bass, 31.9% of the 8.0 — 11.9 inch fish, and 1.4% of the 12.0 — 14.9 inch fish. At Carr Creek Lake, 2001 spring electrofishing samples found 72.6% of all largemouth bass collected to be stocked fish. When broken down by size-group, the stocked largemouth bass made up 90.5 % of the <8.0 inch bass, 46.9% of the 8.0 — 11.9 inch fish, and 4.9% of the 12.0 — 14.9 inch fish. In Dewey Lake, 52.6% of the largemouth bass collected in 2001 spring electrofishing samples were stocked fish. When broken down by size-group, the stocked largemouth bass made up 78.8 % of the <8.0 inch bass, 24.8% of the 8.0 — 11.9 inch fish, and 0.3% of the 12.0 — 14.9 inch fish. Stocked largemouth bass, in each reservoir, recruited to the 12.0 — 14.9 inch size-group for the first time in 2001. Percentage representation of stocked bass in this size-group is expected to increase in our spring 2002-electrofishing samples.
       
    • Indexing Largemouth Bass Year-Class Strength and Recruitment to the Fishery
      Gerry Buynak, Fish and Wildlife Technical Program Coordinator, gerard.buynak@mail.state.ky.us, 1-800-852-0942 ext. 354
       
      The largemouth bass are the number one sport fish sought by Kentucky anglers and are the primary predator found in Kentucky’s public lakes and reservoirs. Numerous studies have shown that year-class strength regulates recruitment to the fishery and dictates both anglers catch and satisfaction with each fishery. Year-class production in Kentucky’s lakes is highly variable and is impacted by many abiotic and biotic variables including productivity, hydraulic retention, and food availability. It is important to remember that year-class production is not controlled by a single variable, but is the result of a combination of many factors acting together. The first indication of the strength of each year class can be obtained in each body of water during the fall of each year. The primary data needed to begin to build an understanding of year-class production and recruitment to the fishery in each water body is catch-per-unit-effort (CPUE or density) of all sizes of age-0 bass, CPUE of large age-0 bass, and mean length of age-0 fish. Each of these variables play a role in over-winter survival and subsequent year-class strength of bass at age 1. Work on Kentucky reservoirs and reservoirs throughout the country indicate that if a year class is strong at age 1 it will remains strong in future years and provide for increased angler satisfaction. The opposite will be true if weak year classes are produced especially when weak year-classes are produced in successive years.
       
      Knowledge of year-class strength, variables affecting year-class production, and recruitment to each fishery is essential to developing a pro-active management approach which includes fingerling largemouth bass stockings. Studies completed at Taylorsville Lake and ongoing studies at Dewey, Carr Creek, and Grayson lakes indicate that largemouth bass fingerling stockings maybe a viable management option that can provide positive benefits to largemouth bass populations and angler catches and eventually result in increased angler satisfaction. These studies indicate that stocking can be used as a viable management option to moderate declines in densities of largemouth bass especially if natural year-class production is low. It must be pointed out, however, that these studies have also shown that stocking of largemouth bass on a strong natural year class has negative impacts on both wild and stocked fish and ultimately reduced year-class strength at age 1. Thus it is important to know the relative strength of each years class to best manage each fisheries. In order to prepare for a scientifically based pro-active largemouth bass stocking management program, the following is needed.
       
      The objectives of this program are to: 1) determine and better understand black bass year-class production at age-0, 2) determine age-1 carrying capacity for each body of water, 3) model relationships between age-o fish and densities of age-1 fish, 4) model relationship between age-1 fish and recruitment to the fishery at each lake, 5) determine if remedial fingerling largemouth bass stockings are needed to supplement natural year-class production in each water body, and 6) to inform anglers on future trends in each fishery.
       
    • Evaluation of Timing of Prey Availability Relative to Walleye Stocking in Kentucky Impoundments
      Jeff Ross, Fisheries Research Biologist, jeff.ross@mail.state.ky.us, 1-800-852-0942 ext. 361
      Dave Dreves, Fisheries Research Biologist, dave.dreves@mail.state.ky.us, 1-800-852-0952 ext. 363
       
      A lake strain of walleye is currently being stocked in seven Kentucky reservoirs with coolwater habitat. Fingerling walleye are stocked in May at 25-42 mm. These fisheries have been disappointing in terms of total return and catch rate. A possible limiting factor for predator survival is the availability of suitable prey. The Kentucky Department of Fish and Wildlife Resources is interested in refining walleye stocking protocols to synchronize stocking with periods of peak prey abundance.
       
      The objectives of our study are to evaluate and quantify the temporal abundance patterns of gizzard shad in tow eastern and two western Kentucky impoundments. Quantify the gape width limitation of fingerling walleye and use this to evaluate synchrony of stocking with morphologically consumable prey. Quantify the survival from stocking to age 1of several cohorts of walleye over a temporal range of different available prey sizes.
       
      The study is currently in it final (third) year. Walleye were stocked on two dates each year in early and late May. Otoliths of stocked walleye were marked with oxytetracycline to distinguish early from late stocks. Walleye gape width was used in conjunction with larval body depth of gizzard shad to identify peak periods of available shad forage. Gizzard shad were sampled from late April to mid-June using a neuston net and were enumerated and measured for length. Temperature and secchi depths were also measured from late April to mid-June. Walleye were sampled from October to December using electrofishing gear to collect data necessary to determine relative survival of early and late stocked walleye. Otoliths collected form young of the year walleye were analyzed for oxytetracycline marks.
       
      Results up to this point continue to point towards much higher survival of the late stocked (late May) walleye. This later date is essentially the longest our hatcheries can hold walleye due to double cropping of ponds. Walleye size at stocking in 2001 averaged 27.6 mm for the early May and 41.2 mm for the late May stocking. In each year, survival of walleye till fall has been dramatically biased towards the late May stocked fish with 72-99% of the returns coming form these fish.
       
      Yearly variation in timing of shad availability does not seem to correlate with the survival of the early stocked walleye. Size and condition of walleye at time of stocking appears to play a major role in their survival in Kentucky reservoirs. The two-week difference in stocking dates is all it takes to produce such disparity in survival of our stocked walleye. Gizzard shad density may, however, act as a buffer against predation of stocked walleye. In each year, shad densities have been low at the time of the early walleye stocking. Early stocked walleye may therefore be subjected to heavy predation as they are extremely vulnerable at the time. Handling/stocking mortality does not appear to be a factor as we found less than 5.0% mortality for either group of walleye 24 hours after stocking.
       
      Further data analysis should provide a better insight into the mechanisms affecting stocked walleye survival in Kentucky reservoirs.

      To the top up_arrow.gif (883 bytes)

 

Lead Net Evaluation for Crappie Sampling - Gears currently used to assess fish populations (frame nets, gill nets, electrofishing, and rotenone), are not providing adequate crappie CPUE to provide accurate appraisals of population characteristics. Current gear types also create bias for certain length groups within a population.

A sampling technique is needed that will provide maximum CPUE for man-hours expended and will provide unbiased data for all length groups of crappie. A series of lead nets with mesh sizes from 0.5”–2.0” have the potential to provide adequate catches of crappie, and may be more efficient than frame nets in providing data needed to assess crappie populations. Sampling was conducted in Caney Creek Reservoir to compare CPUE of frame nets and the lead net series. Results are encouraging. Sampling will be expanded to at least three reservoirs in Fall 2002.

Artificial Reefs From Feed Pallets -  Many of our Louisiana impoundments have long since lost their available complex cover. To that end, LDWF is now in the process of developing guidelines to address construction and deployment of artificial reefs. Our primary concern is that materials or methods used under the new guidelines initiate no environmental consequences. The materials used must be readily available, inexpensive, durable, easy to handle, and provide maximum structural complexity.

Plastic feed pallets have met those criteria and are showing high potential for success. Reefs of the pallets will be deployed in at least three Louisiana reservoirs in 2002.

To the top up_arrow.gif (883 bytes)
 

  • F-41-R-24 FACTORS INFLUENCING FISH POPULATIONS IN OKLAHOMA WATERS (Ok. State Coop Unit - Dana Winkleman danaw@okstate.edu)
     
    • Project 23: Evaluation of the Flathead Catfish Population and Fishery on Lake Carl Blackwell, Oklahoma, with Emphasis on the Effects of Noodling
    • Project 26: Texoma Striped Bass Spawning & Recruitment
      Evaluation: An evaluation of differences in habitat preferences among larval striped bass in the Red River and Washita River arms of Lake Texoma.
    • Project 27: Texoma Striped Bass Spawning & Recruitment
      Evaluation: An evaluation of differences in survival and recruitment of larval striped bass between the Red River and Washita River arms of Lake Texoma.
       
  • F-50-R-8 FISH RESEARCH FOR OKLAHOMA WATERS (Oklahoma Fishery Research Lab - Greg Summers gsummers@odwc.state.ok.us)
     
    • Project 14: Texoma Striped Bass Spawning & Recruitment
      Evaluation: Identification of spawning locations in the Red River and Washita River arms of Lake Texoma.
    • Project 16: Texoma Striped Bass Spawning & Recruitment
      Evaluation: An evaluation of differences in striped bass egg production between the Red River and Washita River arms of Lake Texoma.
    • Project 17: Development of a GIS database to evaluate spatial differences in angler participation and license buying patterns.
    • Project 18: Evaluation of a White Perch invasion of Kaw Lake.
       

To the top up_arrow.gif (883 bytes)